The profanity pack looks like it's going to be a repeat of hot coffee.

This sentence bothers me.
The Hot Coffee modification for Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was a third-party alteration to the game code that unlocked a sex mini-game featuring simulated intercourse (no actual penetration was visible). The ESRB, when reviewing the game for an age classification/rating, was not aware of the inclusion of this content and gave it a "M" rating based on the content that it was shown. The actual problem was that the sexually explicit content, regardless of its unrealistic and inaccessible nature, was contained on the official game media, and it was accessible using an easily obtainable patch. Therefore, the issue was more the discrepancy between the content that was reviewed and the content that was actually shipped. The actual content itself was quite benign, considering the context.
The profanity pack is, from the description, just a few sound files with vulgar words. It doesn't ship with the actual game; therefore, the ability to apply this modification does not alter the ESRB rating of the base game, as it does not provide or alter access to material that is contained on the original disc or install files. In addition, a parental authority would be in a position to control access to this supplemental material and prevent minors in their custody from viewing content that they considered offensive.
Be aware of the distinction between actual controversy over misrepresentation and freedom of speech. Violence is more offensive than sexuality in my opinion, and words are just words.
Fuck.